Cardioprotective effects of p-coumaric acid on tachycardia, inflammation, ion pump dysfunction, and electrolyte imbalance in isoproterenol-induced experimental myocardial infarction.

Cardiovascular diseases cause a large number of deaths throughout the world. No research was conducted earlier on p-coumaric acid's effect on tachycardia, inflammation, ion pump dysfunction, and electrolyte imbalance. Hence, we appraised the above-said parameters in isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarcted rats. This investigation included 24 male albino Wistar rats in 4 groups. Normal control Group 1, p-coumaric acid (8 mg/kg body weight) alone treated Group 2, Isoproterenol (100 mg/kg body weight) induced myocardial infarcted Group 3, p-coumaric acid (8 mg/kg body weight) pretreated isoproterenol (100 mg/kg body weight) induced Group 4. After 1 day of the last dose of isoproterenol injection (day 10), rats were killed and blood and heart were taken and inflammatory markers, lipid peroxidation, nonenzymatic antioxidants, ion pumps, and electrolytes were measured. The heart rate, serum cardiac troponin-T, serum/plasma inflammatory markers, and heart proinflammatory cytokines were raised in isoproterenol-induced rats. Isoproterenol also enhanced plasma lipid peroxidation, lessened plasma nonenzymatic antioxidants, and altered heart ion pumps and serum and heart electrolytes. In this study, p-coumaric acid pretreatment orally for 7 days to isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarcted rats prevented changes in the above-cited parameters. p-Coumaric acid's anti-tachycardial, anti-inflammatory, anti-ion pump dysfunction and anti-electrolyte imbalance properties are the mechanisms for these cardioprotective effects.

Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol compared with Propofol during general anesthesia induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).

BACKGROUND: Ciprofol, a newer entrant with similarities to propofol, has shown promise with a potentially improved safety profile, making it an attractive alternative for induction of general anesthesia. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ciprofol compared with propofol during general anesthesia induction. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Clinical Trial.gov, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to July 2023 to identify relevant studies. All statistical analyses were conducted using R statistical software version 4.1.2. RESULTS: Thirteen Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) encompassing a total of 1998 participants, were included in our analysis. The pooled analysis indicated that Ciprofol was associated with a notably lower incidence of pain upon injection [RR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.23; I^2 = 43%, p < 0.0000001] and was non-inferior to propofol in terms of anesthesia success rate [RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.01; I^2 = 0%; p = 0.43]. In terms of safety, the incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the ciprofol group [RR:0.82; 95% CI:0.68 to 0.98; I^2 = 48%; p = 0.03]. However, no statistically significant differences were found for postoperative hypertension, bradycardia, or tachycardia. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, Ciprofol is not inferior to Propofol in terms of its effectiveness in general anesthesia. Ciprofol emerges as a valuable alternative sedative with fewer side effects, especially reduced injection pain, when compared to Propofol. SUMMARY: Propofol, frequently utilized as an anesthetic, provides swift onset and quick recovery. However, it has drawbacks such as a narrow effective dosage range and a high occurrence of adverse effects, particularly pain upon injection. Ciprofol, a more recent drug with propofol-like properties, has demonstrated promise and may have an improved safety profile, making it a compelling alternative for inducing general anesthesia. This meta-analysis compared the safety and effectiveness of Ciprofol with Propofol for general anesthesia induction in a range of medical procedures, encompassing thirteen Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and 1998 individuals. The pooled analysis indicated that Ciprofol was associated with a notably lower incidence of pain upon injection [RR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.23; I^2 = 43%, p < 0.0000001] and was non-inferior to propofol in terms of anesthesia success rate [RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.01; I^2 = 0%; p = 0.43]. In terms of safety, the incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the ciprofol group [RR:0.82; 95% CI:0.68 to 0.98; I^2 = 48%; p = 0.03]. However, no statistically significant differences were found for hypertension, bradycardia, or tachycardia. In conclusion, ciprofol is equally effective at inducing and maintaining general anesthesia as propofol. When compared to propofol, ciprofol is a better alternative sedative for operations including fiberoptic bronchoscopy, gynecological procedures, gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, and elective surgeries because it has less adverse effects, most notably less painful injections.

Clozapine-related tachycardia: A conundrum to identify and treat.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the rates and persistence of clozapine-induced tachycardia and heart-rate differences in patients treated with ß-blockers in the largest sample of patients with a psychotic disorder to date. METHOD: An audit of medical files for 101 patients who attended a clozapine community clinic and analysis of monthly measurements of resting heart rates. RESULTS: 51% met the clinical criteria for tachycardia. Heart rates were stable over time. ß-blockers were associated with small but significant reductions in heart rates. CONCLUSION: The cardiovascular risks of clozapine are often overlooked. ß-blockers are useful in lowering heart rates but they may be insufficient to reduce cardiac risk.

Dexmedetomidine Withdrawal Syndrome in Children in the PICU: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review literature describing the clinical presentation, risk factors, and treatment for dexmedetomidine withdrawal in the PICU (PROSPERO: CRD42022307178). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were published from January 2000 to January 2022 and reported clinical data for patients younger than 21 years old following discontinuation of dexmedetomidine after greater than or equal to 24 hours of infusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Abstracts identified during an initial search were screened and data were manually abstracted after full-text review of eligible articles. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. Summary statistics were provided and Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to identify relationships between covariates and withdrawal signs. A weighted prevalence for each withdrawal sign was generated using a random-effects model. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-three studies (22 of which were retrospective cohort studies) containing 28 distinct cohorts were included. Median cumulative dexmedetomidine exposure by dose was 105.95 µg/kg (range, 30-232.7 µg/kg), median dexmedetomidine infusion duration was 131.75 hours (range, 20.5-525.6 hr). Weighted estimates for proportion (95% CI) of subjects experiencing withdrawal signs across all cohorts were: hypertension 0.34 (range, 0.0-0.92), tachycardia 0.26 (range, 0.0-0.87), and agitation 0.26 (range, 0.09-0.77). Meta-analysis revealed no correlation between dexmedetomidine exposure variables and withdrawal signs. A moderate negative monotonic relationship existed between the proportion of patients who had undergone cardiac surgery and the proportion experiencing hypertension (correlation coefficient, -0.47; p = 0.048) and tachycardia (correlation coefficient, -0.57; p = 0.008), indicating that in cohorts with a higher proportion of patients who were postcardiac surgery, there were fewer occurrences of hypertension and or tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: On review of the 2000-2022 literature, dexmedetomidine withdrawal may be characterized by tachycardia, hypertension, or agitation, particularly with higher cumulative doses or prolonged durations. Since most studies included in the review were retrospective, prospective studies are needed to further clarify risk factors, establish diagnostic criteria, and identify optimal management strategies.

Cardiovascular safety pharmacology of ivermectin assessed using the isoflurane-anesthetized beagle dogs: ICH S7B follow-up study.

Antiparasitic ivermectin has been reported to induce cardiovascular adverse events, including orthostatic hypotension, tachycardia and cardiopulmonary arrest, of which the underlying pathophysiology remains unknown. Since its drug repurposing as an antiviral agent is underway at higher doses than those for antiparasitic, we evaluated the cardiovascular safety pharmacology of ivermectin using isoflurane-anesthetized beagle dogs (n=4). Ivermectin in doses of 0.1 followed by 1 mg/kg was intravenously infused over 10 min with an interval of 20 min, attaining peak plasma concentrations of 0.94 ± 0.04 and 8.82 ± 1.25 µg/mL, which were 29-31 and 276-288 times higher than those observed after its antiparasitic oral dose of 12 mg/body, respectively. The latter peak concentration was > 2 times greater than those inhibiting proliferation of dengue virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and hepatitis B virus in vitro. Ivermectin decreased heart rate without altering mean blood pressure, suggesting that ivermectin does not cause hypotension or tachycardia directly. Ivermectin hardly altered atrioventricular nodal or intraventricular conduction, indicating a lack of inhibitory action on Ca2+ or Na+ channel in vivo. Ivermectin prolonged QT interval/QTcV in a dose-related manner and tended to slow the repolarization speed in a reverse frequency-dependent manner, supporting previously described its IKr inhibition, which would explain Tpeak-Tend prolongation and heart-rate reduction in this study. Meanwhile, ivermectin did not significantly prolong J-Tpeakc or terminal repolarization period, indicating torsadogenic potential of ivermectin leading to the onset of cardiopulmonary arrest would be small. Thus, ivermectin has a broad range of cardiovascular safety profiles, which will help facilitate its drug repurposing.

Anthracyclines and the risk of arrhythmias: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There have been controversial findings from recent studies regarding anthracyclines use and the subsequent risk of arrhythmias. This study aimed to evaluate the existing evidence of the risk of arrhythmias in patients treated with anthracyclines. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched up to April 2022 using keywords such as "anthracycline" and "arrhythmia." Dichotomous data were presented as relative risk (RR) and confidence interval (CI), while continuous data were presented as mean difference (MD) and CI. Revman software version 5.4 was used for the analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included with a total of 26891 subjects. Pooled analysis showed that anthracyclines therapy was significantly associated with a higher risk of arrhythmia (RR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.41-1.76; P < .00001), ST segment and T wave abnormalities (RR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.18-2.55, P = .005), conduction abnormalities and AV block (RR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.06-3.25, P = .03), and tachycardia (RR: 1.736, 95% CI: 1.11-2.69, P = .02). Further analyses of the associations between anthracyclines and atrial flutter (RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.29-5.89, P = .74), atrial ectopic beats (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.78-2.05, P = .34), and ventricular ectopic beats (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.53-1.65, P = .81) showed no statistically significant results. Higher doses of anthracycline were associated with a higher risk of arrhythmias (RR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.08-2.05; P = .02) compared to the lower doses (RR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.00-1.85; P = .05). Newer generations of Anthracycline maintained the arrhythmogenic properties of previous generations, such as Doxorubicin. CONCLUSION: Anthracyclines therapy was significantly associated with an increased risk of arrhythmias. Accordingly, Patients treated with anthracyclines should be screened for ECG abnormalities and these drugs should be avoided in patients susceptible to arrhythmia. The potential benefit of the administration of prophylactic anti-fibrotic and anti-arrhythmic drugs should also be explored.

Optimal use of intravenous landiolol in acute cardiac care.

INTRODUCTION: B-blockers are regarded as beneficial pharmacologic agents in cardiac care, but their role in the acute setting remains ambiguous. Increasing evidence supports the important role of landiolol in critical care, a highly cardioselective intravenous b-blocker with rapid onset of action and short elimination time. Among its most valuable properties, which may aid to overcome special reservations related to b-blocker therapy in the acute setting, landiolol has a potent negative chronotropic effect while at the same time it exhibits a mild negative inotropic effect. AREAS COVERED: This expert opinion review aims to present basic pharmacologic aspects of landiolol and provide current clinical research focused on its efficacy and safety. EXPERT OPINION: Landiolol is a valuable and safe pharmacologic agent in acute cardiac care. Japanese and European guidelines have incorporated its use for the management of atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with cardiac dysfunction. Although emerging clinical trials have experimented its use in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous intervention and in patients with septic cardiomyopathy, more studies are needed in order to establish its value in such cardiac conditions.

Clinical and electrocardiographic factors associated with adverse cardiovascular events in bupropion exposures.

INTRODUCTION: Bupropion toxicity can cause cardiogenic shock, ventricular dysrhythmias, and death. Clinical and electrocardiographic factors associated with adverse cardiovascular events in bupropion toxicity have not been well-studied. This study aimed to identify factors associated with adverse cardiovascular events in adult patients with isolated bupropion exposures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study queried the National Poison Data System from 2019 through 2020. We included patients 20 years or older with acute or acute-on-chronic single-agent bupropion exposures evaluated in a healthcare facility. Exclusion criteria were confirmed non-exposure, withdrawal as a reason for exposure, lack of follow-up, documentation that exposure was probably not responsible for the effects, and missing data. The primary outcome was adverse cardiovascular events, defined as the presence of any of the following: vasopressor use, ventricular dysrhythmia, myocardial injury, or cardiac arrest. Independent variables were age, the intentionality of exposure, seizures, tachycardia, QRS widening, and QTc prolongation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to test for independent associations between independent variables and adverse cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Of 4,640 patients included in the final analysis (56.7% female, 56.5% suspected suicidal intent), 68 (1.47%) experienced an adverse cardiovascular event. Age (odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence intervals 1.02-1.05), single seizure (odds ratio 9.18; 95% confidence intervals 4.24-19.9) and complicated seizures (odds ratio 38.9; 95% confidence intervals 19.3-78.1), QRS widening (odds ratio 3.01; 95% confidence intervals 1.62-5.59), and QTc prolongation (odds ratio 1.76; 95% confidence intervals 1.00-3.10) were independently associated with adverse cardiovascular events. No patients with unintentional exposure experienced adverse cardiovascular events, prohibiting intentionality from inclusion in the regression model. In the post hoc subgroup analysis of intentional exposures, age, single and complicated seizures, and QRS widening remained independently associated with adverse cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing age, seizures, QRS widening, and QTc prolongation were associated with adverse cardiovascular events in bupropion exposures. Adverse cardiovascular events did not occur in unintentional exposures. Further research is needed to develop screening tools and treatments for bupropion cardiotoxicity.

Unusual Tachycardia After Cocaine Use.

This case report presents the electrocardiogram findings of a patient in their 20s with severe midsternal chest pain of several hours' duration after cocaine use.

Acute Cardiovascular and Cardiorespiratory Effects of JWH-018 in Awake and Freely Moving Mice: Mechanism of Action and Possible Antidotal Interventions?

JWH-018 is the most known compound among synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) used for their psychoactive effects. SCs-based products are responsible for several intoxications in humans. Cardiac toxicity is among the main side effects observed in emergency departments: SCs intake induces harmful effects such as hypertension, tachycardia, chest pain, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, breathing impairment, and dyspnea. This study aims to investigate how cardio-respiratory and vascular JWH-018 (6 mg/kg) responses can be modulated by antidotes already in clinical use. The tested antidotes are amiodarone (5 mg/kg), atropine (5 mg/kg), nifedipine (1 mg/kg), and propranolol (2 mg/kg). The detection of heart rate, breath rate, arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and pulse distention are provided by a non-invasive apparatus (Mouse Ox Plus) in awake and freely moving CD-1 male mice. Tachyarrhythmia events are also evaluated. Results show that while all tested antidotes reduce tachycardia and tachyarrhythmic events and improve breathing functions, only atropine completely reverts the heart rate and pulse distension. These data may suggest that cardiorespiratory mechanisms of JWH-018-induced tachyarrhythmia involve sympathetic, cholinergic, and ion channel modulation. Current findings also provide valuable impetus to identify potential antidotal intervention to support physicians in the treatment of intoxicated patients in emergency clinical settings.

An unusual route of non-intentional intoxication by ecstasy in a toddler.

We report a pediatric case of ecstasy intoxication via an unusual route. A mother called the emergency services after her daughter had inserted an ecstasy pill into her nose. During transportation, the child developed hypertension, tachycardia, and tachypnea. She was admitted to the nearest regional hospital, where a physical examination revealed psychomotor agitation, mydriasis, hypertension, tachycardia, and no hyperthermia. Blood tests showed no abnormalities. She was subsequently transferred to a tertiary-level pediatric hospital. During transportation, she was described as being intensely agitated with persistent mydriasis, tachycardia, and high blood pressure. Urinary toxicological screening confirmed the presence of MDMA. She was discharged after 24 h.

Effectiveness of intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine in reducing the incidence of tachyarrhythmia after congenital cardiac surgery in neonates and infants: a doubly robust method estimation analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The antiarrhythmic effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) have been suggested, but there are controversial reports on the effectiveness of intraoperative use of DEX to reduce the incidence of postoperative tachyarrhythmia (POT). METHODS: From a local European Congenital Heart Surgery Association database, we included patients operated for congenital heart diseases under cardiopulmonary bypass within a 5-year period (2017-2021), during which intraoperative use of high dose of DEX (1-1.4 µg/kg/h) was implemented. A doubly robust matching estimation of the causal effect of DEX on the incidence of POT was conducted. We combined a multimodal estimation model in patients not exposed to DEX (disease risk score) as well as a regression analysis in a matched cohort for patients exposured to DEX. RESULTS: From a cohort of 593 surgeries (514 patients) occurring during the study period, doubly matched analysis consisted of the analysis of 426 surgeries conducted under DEX or not (213 per group). The probability of developing POT in patients exposed to DEX was 6.6% (95% confidence interval 0.032-0.099) vs 14.5% (95% confidence interval 0.098-0.193) in the group of patients not exposed to DEX. The doubly robust matched estimation method showed a mean reduction of 8.8% (95% confidence interval -0.137 to -0.023) of POT when DEX is used for intraoperative anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: The use of high doses of DEX during anaesthesia for congenital heart surgery in neonates and infants is associated with a moderate but significant reduction of POT.

A Case of Wide QRS Tachycardia After the Local Administration of Epinephrine to Reduce Bleeding During General Anesthesia.

We report a case of wide QRS tachycardia or ventricular tachycardia with a pulse after the administration of epinephrine under general anesthesia. After induction and achieving a sufficiently deep plane of general anesthesia, gauze soaked in a 1:100,000 epinephrine solution was applied to the patient's nasal mucosa and 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was administered via intraoral infiltration. Several minutes after the start of surgery, the patient's blood pressure and heart rate suddenly increased and a wide QRS tachycardia was observed on the electrocardiogram, which then reverted to a normal sinus rhythm. According to the past reports, similar arrhythmias have occurred after administration of epinephrine in the head and neck. These findings suggest that anesthesia providers must be aware of the risks associated with epinephrine and local anesthetic use, particularly in the head and neck region.

Duloxetine overdose causes sympathomimetic and serotonin toxicity without major complications.

OBJECTIVE: Duloxetine is a commonly used antidepressant that is a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. We aimed to investigate the frequency and severity of clinical effects following duloxetine overdose. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review of duloxetine overdoses (>120 mg) admitted to two tertiary toxicology units between March 2007 and May 2021. Demographic information, details of ingestion (dose, co-ingestants), clinical effects, investigations (ECG parameters including QT interval), complications (coma [GCS < 9], serotonin toxicity, seizures and cardiovascular effects), length of stay [LOS] and intensive care unit [ICU] admission were extracted from a clinical database. RESULTS: There were 241 duloxetine overdoses (>120 mg), median age 37 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 25-48 years) and there were 156 females (65%). The median dose was 735 mg (IQR: 405-1200 mg). In 177 patients, other medications were co-ingested, most commonly alcohol, paracetamol, quetiapine, diazepam, ibuprofen, pregabalin and oxycodone. These patients were more likely to be admitted to ICU (12 [7%] vs. none; p = 0.040), develop coma (16 [9%] vs. none; p = 0.008) and hypotension [systolic BP < 90 mmHg] (15 [8%] vs. one; p = 0.076). Sixty four patients ingested duloxetine alone with a median dose of 840 mg (180-4200 mg). The median LOS, in the duloxetine only group, was 13 h (IQR:8.3-18 h), which was significantly shorter than those taking coingestants, 19 h (IQR:12-31 h; p = 0.004). None of these patients were intubated. Six patients developed moderate serotonin toxicity, without complications and one had a single seizure. Tachycardia occurred in 31 patients (48%) and mild hypertension (systolic BP > 140 mmHg) in 29 (45%). One patient had persistent sympathomimetic toxicity, and one had hypotension after droperidol. Two patients of 63 with an ECG recorded had an abnormal QT: one QT 500 ms, HR 46 bpm, which resolved over 3.5 h and a second with tachycardia (QT 360 ms, HR 119 bpm). None of the 64 patients had an arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: Duloxetine overdose most commonly caused sympathomimetic effects and serotonin toxicity, consistent with its pharmacology, and did not result in coma, arrhythmias or intensive care admission, when taken alone in overdose.

Involvement of ß-adrenoceptors in the cardiovascular responses induced by selective adenosine A2A and A2B receptor agonists.

A2A and A2B adenosine receptors produce regionally selective regulation of vascular tone and elicit differing effects on mean arterial pressure (MAP), whilst inducing tachycardia. The tachycardia induced by the stimulation of A2A or A2B receptors has been suggested to be mediated by a reflex increase in sympathetic activity. Here, we have investigated the role of ß1 - and ß2 -adrenoceptors in mediating the different cardiovascular responses to selective A2A and A2B receptor stimulation. Hemodynamic variables were measured in conscious male Sprague-Dawley rats (350-450 g) via pulsed Doppler flowmetry. The effect of intravenous infusion (3 min per dose) of the A2A -selective agonist CGS 21680 (0.1, 0.3, 1.0 µg.kg-1 .min-1 ) or the A2B -selective agonist BAY 60-6583 (4.0, 13.3, 40.0 µg.kg-1 .min-1 ) in the absence or following pre-treatment with the non-selective ß-antagonist propranolol (1.0 mg.kg-1 ), the selective ß1 -antagonist CGP 20712A (200 µg.kg-1 ), or the selective ß2 -antagonist ICI 118,551 (2.0 mg.kg-1 ) was investigated (maintenance doses also administered). CGP 20712A and propranolol significantly reduced the tachycardic response to CGS 21680, with no change in the effect on MAP. ICI 118,551 increased BAY 60-6583-mediated renal and mesenteric flows, but did not affect the heart rate response. CGP 20712A attenuated the BAY 60-6583-induced tachycardia. These data imply a direct stimulation of the sympathetic activity via cardiac ß1 -adrenoceptors as a mechanism for the A2A - and A2B -induced tachycardia. However, the regionally selective effects of A2B agonists on vascular conductance were independent of sympathetic activity and may be exploitable for the treatment of acute kidney injury and mesenteric ischemia.